Ingredients
Current formulation and amounts
Published informationFor health and wellness brand, content and regulatory teams
People ask AI about ingredients, testing, safety and suitability. Monitor how your products are described, identify unsupported or outdated statements, and give your team a clearer view of the evidence and official guidance available to reference.
Current formulation and amounts
Published informationMethod, batch and scope
Source to verifyProduct facts ≠ individual suitability
Health and benefit claims need qualified review.The questions
These are information needs to monitor, not medical questions for a marketing team to answer independently. Safety and suitability require authoritative guidance and qualified review.
Ingredients, amounts and formulation details should match the current label.
State what was tested, by whom and which product or batch it covers.
Keep published instructions consistent with approved labeling for the market.
Do not omit limitations or warnings to make a page more persuasive.
Distinguish evidence about an ingredient from evidence about the finished product.
Direct individual medication and suitability questions to an appropriate clinician or pharmacist.
The facts
Product pages should make the scope, source and limits of the information clear. Model confidence is not evidence of medical accuracy.
The boundary between information and advice
Use observed answers to identify statements that need qualified review. Keep the original claim, evidence and its limits together.
Illustrative review routing only. Monitoring does not validate a health claim, establish individual suitability or provide medical advice.
An evidence-first review
Use visibility monitoring to surface information issues while keeping medical, scientific and regulatory decisions with qualified reviewers.
Choose the product range, audience and jurisdiction. Track information questions separately from requests for personal diagnosis or treatment advice.
Review descriptions against current labels, evidence and official guidance. Identify statements, omissions and citations that require expert assessment.
Have qualified reviewers approve factual changes and disclosures. Revisit the monitored questions to see whether inaccurate descriptions continue to appear.
GeckoCheck is a visibility and content tool, not medical advice or a compliance certification. Clinical claims and regulatory obligations remain subject to qualified review.
One connected platform
Connect what AI says with the product information and editorial work your reviewers can assess.
Review product descriptions, mentions and sources across monitored questions.
Explore IntelligenceDecideIdentify information gaps and claims that deserve investigation by your team.
Explore ActionsMakePrepare evidence-led briefs and drafts for qualified review before publication.
Explore ContentRead the catalogReview the consistency and completeness of published product attributes.
Explore CommerceTrack paid visibilityUnderstand AI ad placements and competitor activity around relevant questions.
Explore AdsStart with information accuracy
Bring a product range and the information your team is responsible for. Explore a monitoring approach built around accuracy, evidence and review.
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. You can manage your preferences or learn more about our cookie policy.