For competitive strategy and product marketing teams

Your competitors made the shortlist. Find the gaps you can close.

When AI recommends another brand, the useful question is what separates its answer from yours. Compare competitor mentions, positioning and citations to identify the questions, evidence and pages your team should investigate next.

See Intelligence

ChatGPT
Google AI Overview
Gemini
Claude
Perplexity
Copilot
Google AI Mode
Grok
Meta AI
Mistral

Competitive share of voice

Tracked category questions

Brand A: 31%
Your brand: 22%
Brand B: 18%
Brand C: 12%

What you can do

Understand the shortlist, not just your position.

Give product marketing, SEO and strategy teams a shared view of where competitors appear and which evidence is worth examining.

Benchmark the questions buyers use to compare

Track category, use-case and alternative questions against a relevant competitor set. See where you appear together and where another brand is named without you.

Examine how competitors are positioned

Read the reasons an answer gives for recommending each option. Identify which features, audiences and trade-offs are associated with competitors, and whether your own strengths are represented accurately.

Trace the citation gap

Review the pages cited alongside competing brands. Separate missing owned content from gaps in reviews, directories and editorial coverage so each opportunity reaches the right team.

Choose a response you can defend

Prioritize gaps tied to your target customers and actual capabilities. A competitor mention is a starting point for investigation, not a reason to copy every page they publish.

Keep exploring: Why AI visibility agents don't work without competitive intelligence

Investigate the shortlist

Separate a positioning gap from an evidence gap.

A rival being named is not a diagnosis. Compare the reason given with what a buyer can verify on your own site.

Separate a positioning gap from an evidence gap.
Answer observation	What to investigate	A defensible response
A competitor is described as ideal for small teams	Does your use-case page explain team size and setup?	Show the workflow and limits for the audience you actually serve.
A review site is cited instead of your comparison page	Is your comparison current, specific and fair?	Update supported differences and pursue corrections to outdated third-party facts.
Your brand appears, but its key strength is missing	Can the differentiator be verified publicly?	Publish clear evidence rather than repeat a broader positioning claim.

Illustrative investigation framework. A cited source is evidence to inspect, not proof of why a model selected a brand.

A focused competitive review

From a missing mention to a stronger case.

Work through one important use case at a time. The goal is to make your differentiation clearer, not to chase every competitor across every question.

Choose the buying decision
Start with a question where your product is a credible fit. Compare the same wording and context across models rather than mixing unrelated audiences.
Inspect the evidence gap
Read the recommendations and cited pages. Look for missing comparisons, unclear specifications or customer proof that your site does not yet make easy to find.
Act, then compare again
Improve the relevant page or pursue the appropriate third-party coverage. Revisit the question set to see how mentions and citations evolve.

Citations show sources used in an answer, not a complete explanation of a model’s decision. A competitor’s new page and a visibility gain do not establish causation.

Built on the platform